Fictional resume example. Names, employment histories and results are illustrative, not an actual employee record.
Ashley Coleman
Paralegal with experience in case files, legal research, document review, and litigation support. Practical work includes Case management, Legal research, Document review, eDiscovery.
Experience
CACI
Washington · United States
Paralegal
Mar 2022 - now
- Maintained case files with pleadings, correspondence, evidence, deadlines, service status, and attorney review notes; gave the legal team one current record of case status and next action.
- Researched statutes, rules, decisions, and factual sources and summarized authority, relevance, limits, and citation status; helped attorneys distinguish controlling authority from useful but nonbinding material.
- Prepared document collections using custodians, date ranges, search terms, privilege rules, and review coding guidance; made production decisions reproducible and protected privileged material.
- Organized discovery records by custodian and date, checked privilege flags with supervising counsel, and reconciled exhibit references before filing the court document.
- Prepared a legal research memorandum distinguishing binding authority from persuasive cases, recorded citation checks in the case file, and submitted the analysis to the supervising attorney without giving independent legal advice.
- Loaded a litigation document collection into a document database using custodian and date fields, tested saved searches against known responsive files, and corrected coding inconsistencies before attorney review.
- Prepared an eDiscovery review log separating responsive, duplicate and potentially privileged documents; reconciled production identifiers with the export list and reserved privilege and disclosure decisions for the supervising attorney.
- Owned an eDiscovery document-review batch using approved litigation criteria, resolved duplicate document identifiers and completed the privilege-escalation log for attorney review.
- Published legal-research notes using checked citations and document databases, reduced source-retrieval time from 25 to 9 minutes without making independent legal conclusions.
JPMorgan Chase
New York · United States
Paralegal
Jan 2019 - Feb 2022
- Assembled hearing and trial materials with exhibit references, witness files, issue lists, and filing checks. Closed preparation gaps before attorney review and filing deadlines.
- Reconciled document versions and referenced exhibits before counsel review, marked privileged material for restricted handling, and checked filing or response deadlines against the case calendar.
- Prepared a chronology linking dated correspondence to the relevant agreement or case issue, identified a missing exhibit before counsel review, and requested the source document through the approved collection channel.
Selected project
Paralegal — independent case study
Project owner
Feb 2024 - Jun 2024
- Prepared document collections using custodians, date ranges, search terms, privilege rules, and review coding guidance
- Used public sample agreements and invented correspondence to build a case chronology, marked unresolved facts and privilege questions, and linked every issue to the source paragraph instead of supplying an unsupported legal conclusion.
- Prepared a document index and citation-check log, tested a missing attachment and a superseded version, and kept review questions separate from the attorney’s final decision.
- Owned the public-record research exercise using verified citations, resolved an outdated authority reference and completed a source table separating facts from legal questions.
Education
University of Central Florida
Orlando, Florida · United States
B.A. Legal Studies
Sep 2013 - Jun 2017
Relevant coursework: Legal research, litigation, contracts, legal writing
Skills
Role expertise
Case management · Legal research · Document review · eDiscovery · Litigation support
Publications
- Published an independent research-method note using public decisions, explaining citation checks, document provenance and the limits of non-advisory case summaries.


